![[segmentProA]](images/segmentProA.gif)
The segmental man
Among all vertebrates, we meet, at a particular stage of the embryo
development, mesodermic formations following each other that we name metameres or
primordial segments.They are considered as a phylogenetic representation of the
invertebrata body structure, particularly the annulated.
The segmentation of the embryo goes back to the
first phases of its development. Around the 15th day (about 2 mm) the first metameres
appear (cervical vertebras to be) and around the 25th day (about 5 mm) they will count 35.
From this very stage cells will separate from
the neural crest to constitute two parallel cords.
One will give birth to the previsceral plexus
or ganglions, the other to the laterocervical chain of the spinal ganglions. Around the
end of the 3rd month the segmentation of the ganglionic masses will be over, strictly
responding to the rachidian pairs from which they come. This "rosary-like" shape
will turn, in some places, into a "pod" integrating a few "beans" to
constitute the masses of the stellar, thoracic and lumbar ganglions.
The sympathetic system
is the basic element of the nervous system
The spinal ganglion
The sympathetic system, more specifically the laterovertebral ganglion, or spinal
ganglion, plays a prominent role:
It offers something of major interest. Thanks
to it we are now able to define briefly the following three neurological entities:
-
the myotome, governed by the somatic motor
neuron
-
the viscerotome, governed by the autonomous
motor neuron
-
the dermatome, governed by the juxtaposition of
the exteroceptive protoneurone and the peripherical deutoneurone.
The three of them depend upon the same
medullary segment or myelomere.
We must clearly understand that this organization gives
us the explanation
of cutaneous reflexotherapy in its various forms, on the basis of our western
knowledge of embryo-anatomo-immuno-neurophysiology. |
Metamerized segmentation
It is obvious that
interactions do exist between skin, viscera and muscles inside one and same metamerized
segment.
Some people will raise the objection that
metamerized segmentation is extremely vague because segments overlap just like tiles on a
roof; it is therefore difficult to attribute such or such sector to a particular metamere.
About this matter Guy Lazorthes has said:
As far as metamerized areas are concerned we
can observe the differences between the following diagrams.

Guy Lazorthes |
|

Guy Lazorthes |
|

W. Kahle |
As for myself, I refer
to the diagram worked out by W. Kahle from the hypaesthesic deficiencies caused by a
slipped disk. (Anatomie du système nerveux, éditions
Flammarion, Paris)
Aberrations
of the epicritic cutaneous reflex
Using the "plum tree
flower" (a traditional Chinese tool looking like a small
flexible hammer whose head bears seven fine needles) I noticed
that this acupuncture instrument brought about a vasodilatation reaction in the skin areas
where the patient feels "stinging" type sensations (normal areas) and a lack of
erythematous reaction (sometimes even a vasoconstriction) in the areas where
"burning" type sensations are received (abnormal areas).
I have therefore called those
observations "aberrations of the epicritic cutaneous reflex".
The use of this tool confirms the arrangement
of the metamerized segments S1, S2 and S3, materializing them under the shape of white
bands (in cases of lower limbs paralysis), according to the diagram used by W. Kahle.
Spinal
ganglions
The overlapping of a
metamerized area with the following one and the preceding one is logical; in fact, if the
being constituted with rings wants to move he must control and synchronize the movements
of contraction and extension of one of his segments in relation to its nearest neighbours.
The spinal ganglions could therefore appear as
"metamerized mini-brains" linked to one another for synchronization without
burdening the central system with a multitude of details: they are able to cope by
themselves.
They are truly mini-brains because they contain
"intermediate" neurones which manage and modulate the informations between
medullary neurones and cutaneous, muscular and visceral ends.
Decisions are therefore made at this
medullo-ganglionic level which may induce errors: projected informations, conscious or
unconscious (infact pain, cutaneous projection of a visceral information, cutaneous,
visceral or muscular projection of an articular information). Those interpretation errors
will lead to reactions of the central system and defensive mechanisms causing pathologies
rooted in this logic.
Let us listen to Guy Lazorthes :
-
The attack of an internal organ may be
manifested as an added pain which is projected on the parietal cutaneous area, called
dermatome, corresponding to the medullary segment or myelomere to which the sensitive
passages of the organ lead.
"Projected"
pain
The most famous illustration
is Mac Burney's point, which is the projection of an inflamed appendix. This painful point
is situated at the upper two-thirds of a line joining the anterosuperior spine of the
right iliac spine to the umbilicus; it corresponds to an anterior perforating bough of the
12th intercostal nerve.
This is a widespread definition, but questions
remain related this point. During my researches I made clear that this point was not the
only one accounting for a projected visceral pathology; there are numerous others.
The point itself is unreliable because it
is still present after the appendix has been removed; a painful point, identical in
its localization principle, may also manifest itself opposite Mac Burney's, and
sometimes co-existing with it!
What do they mean here?
Experience demonstrates that they correspond to
a suffering in the articular level D12/L1. The proof can be found in the fact that the
lifting of a restriction in the articular mobility makes it disappear at once.
Other questions then arise:
-
is Mac Burney's a cutaneous projection pointing
out an inflamed appendix or the projection of an articular nociceptive information?
-
could this nociceptive information be registered
by the central system as coming from the appendix?
-
could this projected information launch a
defensive inflammatory reaction at the appendix level?
This hypothesis may explain the reason why the
appendix sometimes shows a normal condition during surgical operation whereas all the
clinical signs on which the diagnosis is based were present: nausea, Mac Burney and
Bombery test (as a surgeon friend of mine told me).
We could answer those questions by checking the
presence of a restriction in the articular mobility D12/L1 in a patient showing all signs
of appendix inflammation, then lifting this restriction and observing the changes in the
inflammation and the symptoms.
Other
reflex points
This reasoning enabled me to
discover other reflex points accounting for various visceral pathologies, closely linked
to articular nociceptive information.
Present before the arising of the symptoms
associated with the pathology, they enable every practioner to build or confirm a
diagnosis.
The painful
reflex points are present in:
-
the 1st thoracic metamere (MT for all
pathologies associated with the immunity system)
-
the 2nd MT for pulmonary problems, with
hypersecretion of the nose or the eyes
-
the 3rd MT: pulmonary problems with
hypersecretion
-
the 4th MT: cardiac or pulmonary problems
-
the 5th and 6th MT: stomach problems, especially
anxiety
-
the 8th and 9th metameres: liver pathologies,
gall bladder (on the right side), and pancreas (on the left side)
-
junction of 12th MT and 1st metamere: ovarians
problems.
We must note that the combination of some
specific points is systematically present in some specific forms of pathologies. For
example, nose and eyes allergies in the combination 1 MT and 2 MT and some asthmas. The
asthmatic forms of bronchitis in the combination 1 MT and 3 MT. Eczema forms in the main
combination 1 MT and 8 MT right (liver) whereas psoriasis forms correspond to the
combination 1 MT and 8 MT left (pancreas).
The metamerized localization of cutaneous
pathologies is always associated with vertebral levels which are the root of nociceptive
articular informations projected upon those areas.
Related this matter I do
assert:
The root origin of a pathological reaction in a particular area,
cannot have but one cause: the specific method of linking between this area and the
central system.
Note:
Diabetics always show an 8 MT left point which is extremely painful and often there are
varicosities in this precise area.
Another note:
Those various painful points disappear within a few days or weeks following the lifting of
restrictions in articular mobility of the corresponding levels, as well as the symptoms of
the associated pathology, providing the latter is not degenerative and/or non-reversible.
Visceral problems =
behaviour problems
I also discovered points that suggest a
systematic connection between a visceral problem and a behaviour problem. Those
observations lead me to build the theory of neuro-immuno-psychology, running contrary to
the present-day trend of psycho-neuro-immunology (or dermatology). Once more I assert: the
root origin of a pathological reaction, in a definite area, cannot have but one cause: the
specific way this area is linked to the central system.
Cutaneous damages (for exemple in eczema)
cannot exist in metamerized area without a cause appearing between this area and the
central system. A psychological trouble may appear afterwards but it can never be
considered as the origin of the pathology.
Wilhem Reich might have been a visionary
when he wrote:
-
We impede the free circulation
of our energy through our whole body by creating muscular "shells", rigid or
dead areas encircling us just like rings, at various levels of the body. In order to
protect ourselves from distress as well as pleasure, from all feelings, we block the
circulation of the energy.
(L'analyse caractérielle, éditions Payot, 1971)
If I get enough time (15 or 16
hours of work a day)
I will add pages on this site to give many more explanations about the origin of behaviour
problems.
I have been working on the subject for six
years in close cooperation with psychiatrists, with conclusive results.
I have attempted to get in touch with the
organizations that develop the theory of psycho-neuro-immunology to communicate my
researches. As I am not a member of their scientific community (once more!) they did not
bother responding to my proposals.
The future will confirm the accuracy of my
findings: the scientific community will discover the exact mechanism, but will not be able
to publish on this subject without losing dignity, because my publications, books and
copyrights, came first.
I have never asked money from anybody for
presenting the results of my research. I simply want to present them to the medical
scientific community (in my own country, preferably) but nobody appears to want them.

Copyright © 1998-1999. All rights reserved


|